Justine Larbalestier

reading, writing, eating, drinking, sport

«

»

One Cherie Priest Forgot

In a bizarre oversight Cherie forgot to mention this golden rule of publishing—Never publish a novel which is a thinly disguised account of a murder you committed. It might help the cops bust you:

In his debut 2003 novel Amok, Polish author Krystian Bala describes the torture and murder of a young woman whose hands are bound behind her back with a cord that is then looped to form a noose around her neck. According to a judge’s ruling this week in the western Polish city of Wroclaw, Bala was drawing not on his imagination for that scene, but on his own experience.

Tsk. Tsk. Tsk. I thought we authors were smarter than that?

Plus: killing people is wrong.

On the other hand, his book was a bestseller . . .

Posted by Justine at 0:01, 8 September 2007 under Publishing business, State of the World, Writing life | 17 Comments »

Comments

  1. hillary! Says:

    Soooo, you’re saying it might be OK if you can get a bestseller out of it? tsk tsk tsk…I thought that you were a better person than that! HAHAHA!

    September 8th, 2007 at 12:55 am

  2. Ted Lemon Says:

    God, what does that say? I stopped reading Patricia Cornwall because it just seemed unseemly to depict the killer’s state of mind so gleefully. There’s something a little bit frightening in the idea that people are that into reading a true-to-life account of a brutal murder.

    September 8th, 2007 at 12:57 am

  3. deborahb Says:

    I just read that story in the paper. Brilliant! I can’t wait for his thinly disguised prison ‘fiction’.

    September 8th, 2007 at 2:12 am

  4. Rebecca Says:

    holy….crap.

    September 8th, 2007 at 3:17 am

  5. Malcolm Tredinnick Says:

    To be fair to Cherie, she was noting things she had learnt from her own experiences of being published. Can we give her the benefit of the doubt and assume she doesn’t have experience in this particular area?

    Whilst Cherie’s livejournal user profile does say “naked and killing people”, I suspect she’s taking some artistic license there, rather than advertising her other day job (although, imagine the news story when she’s caught).

    September 8th, 2007 at 3:31 am

  6. 6. Justine Says:

    Hillary!: I believe I was very clear: killing people is wrong.

    Ted: There’s a chance that he’s innocent . . .

    Deborahb: I’m wondering if Amok will/has been translated.

    Malcolm: I’m not implying anything about Cherie. Though I’m sure if she committed murder—not that she would—that she’d be much more crafty about it. Cherie is dead smart.

    September 8th, 2007 at 8:17 am

  7. Karen Says:

    “Write what you know” becomes so much less appealing when applied to sociopaths.

    September 8th, 2007 at 8:46 am

  8. 8. Justine Says:

    Yuppers. There are so many ways in which “write what you know” is terrible advice.

    September 8th, 2007 at 8:48 am

  9. Ariel Cooke Says:

    It reminds me of those Polish jokes. “Did you hear the one about the Polish murder mystery writer? He thought you had to write what you know. Now he’s on trial for murder.” It seems to me that the biggest thing they have on him is about the cell phone being sold from his internet account.
    everything else is circumstantial. unless there are details of the crime in the book that were not generally known.

    September 8th, 2007 at 10:44 am

  10. Ariel Cooke Says:

    better joke phrasing:

    did you hear the one about the polish mystery writer on trial for murder? he heard you have to write what you know.

    September 8th, 2007 at 10:46 am

  11. Katie Says:

    deborahb, i’m sure it will be fascinating!

    September 8th, 2007 at 12:31 pm

  12. janet Says:

    See also Anne Perry. Though I don’t think that any of her novels depict anything like the murder she helped commit.

    September 8th, 2007 at 12:57 pm

  13. Robert Legault Says:

    Well, Ann Perry got convicted, did her time, and then started writing.

    But see also the case of the late Jack Unterweger (a pretty solid bio is out soon from FSG):

    http://www.crimeandinvestigation.co.uk/famous_criminal/25/home/1/Jack_Unterweger_Poet_of_Death.htm

    September 8th, 2007 at 6:31 pm

  14. vicky Says:

    …i laughed a little when i read this. i don’t know why. it’s not the killing part that was funny to me, but…

    crap. what does that say about me?

    September 9th, 2007 at 2:01 am

  15. vicky Says:

    …actually, i think it was more the fact that he was silly enough to write a book about it. not the fact that he killed someone.

    sorry about the double comment.

    September 9th, 2007 at 2:04 am

  16. janet Says:

    After I wrote my comment above, I remembered that I once heard an interview with Sue Grafton in which she told how her first mystery novel came about: she was going through a nasty divorce and had thought up a great way to kill her ex-husband, but instead she wrote a mystery novel using the method. (If you’ve read the novel, you know: oleander poisoning.) I think that’s what is technically known as sublimation.

    September 9th, 2007 at 3:14 am

  17. Stevo Says:

    So who do I have to kill to get published? :)

    September 10th, 2007 at 1:02 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

    Categories

    Archives

    RSS Feed

    Subscribe

<-- -->