<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunshine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2007/07/29/sunshine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2007/07/29/sunshine/</link>
	<description>writing, reading, eating, drinking, sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: niki</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2007/07/29/sunshine/comment-page-1/#comment-52851</link>
		<dc:creator>niki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 21:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=729#comment-52851</guid>
		<description>I watch sunshine on the plane. I didn&#039;t like it. I suspect that watching it on a small screen bouncing up and down occasionally probably isn&#039;t the best format to see this film. As you say, my biggest problem was that I didn&#039;t care if they lived or died or if the world was saved or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch sunshine on the plane. I didn&#8217;t like it. I suspect that watching it on a small screen bouncing up and down occasionally probably isn&#8217;t the best format to see this film. As you say, my biggest problem was that I didn&#8217;t care if they lived or died or if the world was saved or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2007/07/29/sunshine/comment-page-1/#comment-52785</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=729#comment-52785</guid>
		<description>Definitely not alone. My netflix queue is unapologetically movie-free. Movies can be good (or at least people will tell you they&#039;re good) for lots of reasons, but TV is *only* good when the writing is good. Which I guess is why screenwriters are persona non grata on movie sets but in the land of TV, the writer (I&#039;m looking at you, Joss) is king.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely not alone. My netflix queue is unapologetically movie-free. Movies can be good (or at least people will tell you they&#8217;re good) for lots of reasons, but TV is *only* good when the writing is good. Which I guess is why screenwriters are persona non grata on movie sets but in the land of TV, the writer (I&#8217;m looking at you, Joss) is king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2007/07/29/sunshine/comment-page-1/#comment-52746</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=729#comment-52746</guid>
		<description>Pixar can bite me.  I think the rash of animated kids movies with Smurfette syndrome is nothing short of a crisis.  Little girls and boys are watching this crap, which basically teaches them that males are the norm and girls are rare, specialized versions of males with skirts on.  Pixar and Disney should be boycotted until their development goons get out and notice that half the population is female.

As for the suckiness of movies, I overdosed on them about 7 years ago and only rarely dabble nowadays.  I think they blow in part because creative decisions are made by executive types who think they can ensure financial success by following certain packaging formulas, i.e., if you put Actor X in a movie featuring Plot Twist B with sexy Co-star Y, you&#039;ll net Z at the box office.  The truth, however, is that box office success is never predictable and the bulk of a film&#039;s earnings come from ancillary markets (like foreign rights and DVD) which are even less predictable than box office.  Remember Office Space?  Box office disaster, DVD blockbuster.  The film industry has become virtually encrusted with self-appointed &quot;winner-pickers&quot; who crowd their names into the producer credits then claim responsibility for every success while dodging the blame for every failure.  Add to this the fact that directors (despite their &quot;auteur&quot; status) are increasingly the least experienced people on set and you end up with  a formulaic piece of star-packaging slapped together by amateurs.  But what do I know.  I retired from this miserable business seven years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pixar can bite me.  I think the rash of animated kids movies with Smurfette syndrome is nothing short of a crisis.  Little girls and boys are watching this crap, which basically teaches them that males are the norm and girls are rare, specialized versions of males with skirts on.  Pixar and Disney should be boycotted until their development goons get out and notice that half the population is female.</p>
<p>As for the suckiness of movies, I overdosed on them about 7 years ago and only rarely dabble nowadays.  I think they blow in part because creative decisions are made by executive types who think they can ensure financial success by following certain packaging formulas, i.e., if you put Actor X in a movie featuring Plot Twist B with sexy Co-star Y, you&#8217;ll net Z at the box office.  The truth, however, is that box office success is never predictable and the bulk of a film&#8217;s earnings come from ancillary markets (like foreign rights and DVD) which are even less predictable than box office.  Remember Office Space?  Box office disaster, DVD blockbuster.  The film industry has become virtually encrusted with self-appointed &#8220;winner-pickers&#8221; who crowd their names into the producer credits then claim responsibility for every success while dodging the blame for every failure.  Add to this the fact that directors (despite their &#8220;auteur&#8221; status) are increasingly the least experienced people on set and you end up with  a formulaic piece of star-packaging slapped together by amateurs.  But what do I know.  I retired from this miserable business seven years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2007/07/29/sunshine/comment-page-1/#comment-52729</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 06:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=729#comment-52729</guid>
		<description>The Simpsons movie surprised me with how good it was.  Maybe not the kind of film to hug close to your heart, but really, really funny and sharp and smart.  

But yeah, tv has gotten amazingly good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Simpsons movie surprised me with how good it was.  Maybe not the kind of film to hug close to your heart, but really, really funny and sharp and smart.  </p>
<p>But yeah, tv has gotten amazingly good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lili</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2007/07/29/sunshine/comment-page-1/#comment-52725</link>
		<dc:creator>lili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=729#comment-52725</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m so with you. i&#039;ve just picked my 13 films for the Melbourne Film Festival, and i&#039;m feeling guilty for thinking that i&#039;d rather stay home with a bottle of wine and the next episode of studio 60 on the sunset strip.

i think tv is actually better suited to novelists. because you can&#039;t really get to know a character in 120 minutes. but you can in 24 42 minute episodes. there&#039;s much more depth of character*, more time for things to develop and simmer. Sexual tension works sooo much better in tv. i think it&#039;s one of the reasons why there&#039;s never been a really perfect jane austen film made. you just don&#039;t have time to squeeze everything in.


* i&#039;m only talking about the good ones, here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m so with you. i&#8217;ve just picked my 13 films for the Melbourne Film Festival, and i&#8217;m feeling guilty for thinking that i&#8217;d rather stay home with a bottle of wine and the next episode of studio 60 on the sunset strip.</p>
<p>i think tv is actually better suited to novelists. because you can&#8217;t really get to know a character in 120 minutes. but you can in 24 42 minute episodes. there&#8217;s much more depth of character*, more time for things to develop and simmer. Sexual tension works sooo much better in tv. i think it&#8217;s one of the reasons why there&#8217;s never been a really perfect jane austen film made. you just don&#8217;t have time to squeeze everything in.</p>
<p>* i&#8217;m only talking about the good ones, here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Tredinnick</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2007/07/29/sunshine/comment-page-1/#comment-52724</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Tredinnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 05:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=729#comment-52724</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll agree with most of your premise: the cliches and formulaic constructs are annoying. Haven&#039;t seen sunshine, but your description sounds something like I might have expected.

I wonder if you&#039;re viewing the past through rose-coloured glasses a bit, though. There were plenty of truly crap movies in the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s, too. Only the good ones have survived in our memories and DVD collections.

There&#039;s been a few movies in the past few years I&#039;ve enjoyed a lot. Thinking about it, though, they fall into two categories: Chinese films done well (not all them) and some romantic comedies that I&#039;ve enjoyed with friends and talked about a lot afterwards. The first group might be because I&#039;m not up on the typical Chinese cliches, though, so some of my favourites might suck if you were Chinese. And my friends will be the first to point out that my sense of humour is pretty weird, so the second category could be dubious, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree with most of your premise: the cliches and formulaic constructs are annoying. Haven&#8217;t seen sunshine, but your description sounds something like I might have expected.</p>
<p>I wonder if you&#8217;re viewing the past through rose-coloured glasses a bit, though. There were plenty of truly crap movies in the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s, too. Only the good ones have survived in our memories and DVD collections.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been a few movies in the past few years I&#8217;ve enjoyed a lot. Thinking about it, though, they fall into two categories: Chinese films done well (not all them) and some romantic comedies that I&#8217;ve enjoyed with friends and talked about a lot afterwards. The first group might be because I&#8217;m not up on the typical Chinese cliches, though, so some of my favourites might suck if you were Chinese. And my friends will be the first to point out that my sense of humour is pretty weird, so the second category could be dubious, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

