<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Titles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/</link>
	<description>writing, reading, eating, drinking, sport</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:13:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harriet Jordan</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10181</link>
		<dc:creator>Harriet Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 01:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10181</guid>
		<description>A little while ago, I noticed that a particular fantasy author had followed the same naming pattern for all of her trilogies. 

Each trilogy has a particular keyword used in all titles.

Book one uses the keyword as a possessive: either [keyword]&#039;s x or else [keyword] of x.

Book two uses the keyword with an adjective: y [keyword] (or The y [keyword]).

Book three goes back to the same pattern as book one: [keyword]&#039;s z or [keyword] of z.

She&#039;s varied it slightly in the latest trilogy (no identical keyword, although the nouns are thematically linked) but it seems she is still following the possessive, adjective, possessive pattern. I guess when you&#039;re onto a good thing, you stick with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little while ago, I noticed that a particular fantasy author had followed the same naming pattern for all of her trilogies. </p>
<p>Each trilogy has a particular keyword used in all titles.</p>
<p>Book one uses the keyword as a possessive: either [keyword]&#8217;s x or else [keyword] of x.</p>
<p>Book two uses the keyword with an adjective: y [keyword] (or The y [keyword]).</p>
<p>Book three goes back to the same pattern as book one: [keyword]&#8217;s z or [keyword] of z.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s varied it slightly in the latest trilogy (no identical keyword, although the nouns are thematically linked) but it seems she is still following the possessive, adjective, possessive pattern. I guess when you&#8217;re onto a good thing, you stick with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherie priest</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10142</link>
		<dc:creator>cherie priest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10142</guid>
		<description>How about one word, followed by colon with exposition? 

Spook:  Science Tackles the Afterlife
Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers 
Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything	
Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking  

This formula is particularly popular with nonfiction, I&#039;ve noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about one word, followed by colon with exposition? </p>
<p>Spook:  Science Tackles the Afterlife<br />
Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers<br />
Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything<br />
Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking  </p>
<p>This formula is particularly popular with nonfiction, I&#8217;ve noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Pratt</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10133</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10133</guid>
		<description>I have trouble with titles too. I&#039;ve been known to resort to lines from Dante for titles; that was pretty much my darkest hour. I called my first novel The Strange Adventures of Rangergirl, fully expecting the publisher to change it to something less silly, but to my surprise they liked the retro vibe, and kept it. For my new series, I&#039;ve decided I&#039;d like to have more-or-less consistent titles for each book, and I hit on a not-terribly-clever &quot;Adjective Noun&quot; construction (first book is Blood Engines, second will probably be Poison Sleep). Seems simple yet robust. As a reader I hardly pay attention to titles, usually, unless they&#039;re very very good or very very bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have trouble with titles too. I&#8217;ve been known to resort to lines from Dante for titles; that was pretty much my darkest hour. I called my first novel The Strange Adventures of Rangergirl, fully expecting the publisher to change it to something less silly, but to my surprise they liked the retro vibe, and kept it. For my new series, I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;d like to have more-or-less consistent titles for each book, and I hit on a not-terribly-clever &#8220;Adjective Noun&#8221; construction (first book is Blood Engines, second will probably be Poison Sleep). Seems simple yet robust. As a reader I hardly pay attention to titles, usually, unless they&#8217;re very very good or very very bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10112</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10112</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another hint about titles: if you ask for advice on the internet or a large email loop, the chances that you&#039;ll get &quot;a twist of fate&quot; is about 1:3. The chance that you&#039;ll get something with the word fate is 1:1. 

I will never have a book with the word &quot;fate&quot; in the title.*

*This remains to be seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another hint about titles: if you ask for advice on the internet or a large email loop, the chances that you&#8217;ll get &#8220;a twist of fate&#8221; is about 1:3. The chance that you&#8217;ll get something with the word fate is 1:1. </p>
<p>I will never have a book with the word &#8220;fate&#8221; in the title.*</p>
<p>*This remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer, aka literaticat</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10086</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer, aka literaticat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10086</guid>
		<description>ok, well, there&#039;s a slight adjustment to yours:

use a fragment from an anthem, the bible or shakespeare for something thoughtful and emotionally wrenching:  &quot;Little Foxes&quot;; &quot;Grapes of Wrath&quot;; &quot;Winter of Our Discontent&quot;; &quot;Gilead&quot;

use a phrase from engineering, astronomy, architecture, philosophy etc. for a thinky novel to be touted on NPR: &quot;angle of repose&quot;, &quot;transit of venus&quot;, &quot;line of beauty&quot;

quote from a famous poet, well-worn phrase, pop song or nursery rhyme for a popular novel:  &quot;great and terrible beauty&quot;, &quot;And Then There Were None&quot;, &quot;fearful symmetry&quot;, 

use faux legalese for police procedurals and forensic mysteries: &quot;body of evidence&quot;, &quot;corpus delecti&quot;

quote from an over-read poet, well-worn phrase, pop song or nursery rhyme &lt;i&gt;but change it into a pun&lt;/i&gt; for a comedic crime novel or &quot;chick lit&quot;:  &quot;The Cradle Robbers&quot; - &quot;the Maltese Kitten&quot; - &quot;Lead a Horse to Murder&quot; - &quot;the eyes have it&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, well, there&#8217;s a slight adjustment to yours:</p>
<p>use a fragment from an anthem, the bible or shakespeare for something thoughtful and emotionally wrenching:  &#8220;Little Foxes&#8221;; &#8220;Grapes of Wrath&#8221;; &#8220;Winter of Our Discontent&#8221;; &#8220;Gilead&#8221;</p>
<p>use a phrase from engineering, astronomy, architecture, philosophy etc. for a thinky novel to be touted on NPR: &#8220;angle of repose&#8221;, &#8220;transit of venus&#8221;, &#8220;line of beauty&#8221;</p>
<p>quote from a famous poet, well-worn phrase, pop song or nursery rhyme for a popular novel:  &#8220;great and terrible beauty&#8221;, &#8220;And Then There Were None&#8221;, &#8220;fearful symmetry&#8221;, </p>
<p>use faux legalese for police procedurals and forensic mysteries: &#8220;body of evidence&#8221;, &#8220;corpus delecti&#8221;</p>
<p>quote from an over-read poet, well-worn phrase, pop song or nursery rhyme <i>but change it into a pun</i> for a comedic crime novel or &#8220;chick lit&#8221;:  &#8220;The Cradle Robbers&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;the Maltese Kitten&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;Lead a Horse to Murder&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;the eyes have it&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cake</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10082</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10082</guid>
		<description>And then there is Dave Eggers calling his book A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, and getting away with it, dammit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then there is Dave Eggers calling his book A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, and getting away with it, dammit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lili</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10079</link>
		<dc:creator>lili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10079</guid>
		<description>I hate thinking up titles. We struggled so hard to find one for my Joan of arc book -  ended up calling it &#039;joan of arc&#039;, which is boring, but it was a tough one. i wanted &#039;hot chick&#039; or &#039;Fahrenheit joan&#039;, but for some reason my editor didn&#039;t agree.

i wanted to call the current novel &#039;east of the sun&#039;, which for me was totally apt and meaningful. my editor hated it. i railed for ages, before realising that they were right. titles like &#039;east of the sun&#039; or &#039;night voices&#039; or &#039;the right stuff&#039; or &#039;a place in my heart&#039; all sound very generic. they&#039;re difficult to remember, because there&#039;s nothing for your memory to catch on to.

(novel is now called scatterheart)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate thinking up titles. We struggled so hard to find one for my Joan of arc book &#8211;  ended up calling it &#8216;joan of arc&#8217;, which is boring, but it was a tough one. i wanted &#8216;hot chick&#8217; or &#8216;Fahrenheit joan&#8217;, but for some reason my editor didn&#8217;t agree.</p>
<p>i wanted to call the current novel &#8216;east of the sun&#8217;, which for me was totally apt and meaningful. my editor hated it. i railed for ages, before realising that they were right. titles like &#8216;east of the sun&#8217; or &#8216;night voices&#8217; or &#8216;the right stuff&#8217; or &#8216;a place in my heart&#8217; all sound very generic. they&#8217;re difficult to remember, because there&#8217;s nothing for your memory to catch on to.</p>
<p>(novel is now called scatterheart)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camille</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10075</link>
		<dc:creator>camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10075</guid>
		<description>what about the title formula &quot;the [blank]&#039;s [blank]&quot;?
fantasy example: the magician&#039;s sword
romance: the devil&#039;s mistress*
sci-fi: the robot&#039;s dilemma

i just pulled the above out of thin air--apologies to anyone actually using/publishing these titles

*--right, just looked up &quot;the devil&#039;s mistress&quot; out of curiosity, and holy-cramoly, there are no fewer than nine books by this title by totally different authors in a variety of genres. yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the title formula &#8220;the [blank]&#8217;s [blank]&#8220;?<br />
fantasy example: the magician&#8217;s sword<br />
romance: the devil&#8217;s mistress*<br />
sci-fi: the robot&#8217;s dilemma</p>
<p>i just pulled the above out of thin air&#8211;apologies to anyone actually using/publishing these titles</p>
<p>*&#8211;right, just looked up &#8220;the devil&#8217;s mistress&#8221; out of curiosity, and holy-cramoly, there are no fewer than nine books by this title by totally different authors in a variety of genres. yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Willow</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10074</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Willow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10074</guid>
		<description>Some titles are better than the stories within, and vice-versa. I don&#039;t want to name any here, but this is so true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some titles are better than the stories within, and vice-versa. I don&#8217;t want to name any here, but this is so true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10065</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10065</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of reading all of Lani Diane Rich&#039;s various blogs about titling in the past. Her first novel was one she originally wanted to be called Boom!, which switched titles a bunch of times until it ended up being Time Off (or Out, I forget which) for Good Behavior, which has little to do with the book. The book &quot;The Miz Fallons&quot; ended up being &quot;Ex and the Single Girl.&quot; And &quot;Flipping the Bird&quot; (which would have been a fantastic title, given the subject matter) ended up becoming &quot;Maybe Baby,&quot; but almost ended up being &quot;Take A Chance On Him,&quot; even if Lani didn&#039;t like it. She didn&#039;t get to keep a title until book #4.

What I&#039;ve learned from reading Lani&#039;s sites over the years: it doesn&#039;t matter what I title a book, because someone else will end up picking the title for me. In the event that I ever do get published, the novel wiill have some bare-bones, vaguely-indicates-what-the-book-is-about title (say, &quot;The Magical Whatsit&quot;) until someone else picks it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of reading all of Lani Diane Rich&#8217;s various blogs about titling in the past. Her first novel was one she originally wanted to be called Boom!, which switched titles a bunch of times until it ended up being Time Off (or Out, I forget which) for Good Behavior, which has little to do with the book. The book &#8220;The Miz Fallons&#8221; ended up being &#8220;Ex and the Single Girl.&#8221; And &#8220;Flipping the Bird&#8221; (which would have been a fantastic title, given the subject matter) ended up becoming &#8220;Maybe Baby,&#8221; but almost ended up being &#8220;Take A Chance On Him,&#8221; even if Lani didn&#8217;t like it. She didn&#8217;t get to keep a title until book #4.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve learned from reading Lani&#8217;s sites over the years: it doesn&#8217;t matter what I title a book, because someone else will end up picking the title for me. In the event that I ever do get published, the novel wiill have some bare-bones, vaguely-indicates-what-the-book-is-about title (say, &#8220;The Magical Whatsit&#8221;) until someone else picks it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/2006/12/19/titles/comment-page-1/#comment-10060</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinelarbalestier.com/blog/?p=483#comment-10060</guid>
		<description>Never underestimate the titular fruition that comes from the thesaurus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never underestimate the titular fruition that comes from the thesaurus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
