Publishing is not a zero-sum game
Okay, fellow writers, I know you know this, but bugger it, I’ll say it again:
Publishing is not a competitive sport. If another writer is unbelievably successful that does not take away your chance of success. If it has any effect on you at all it’s a positive one. Super sccessful writers create more readers. J. K. Rowling has single-handedly made young adult publishing more profitable and better paying. Every YA writer should fall down on their knees in gratitude. (I have my own J. K. Rowling shrine that I worship at every day. Bless, J. K., bless!)
If we’re defining success as making loads of dosh, then most writers are not super successful, or even mildly successful. I’m certainly not. The majority of published writers cannot make a living from their writing. Does that mean their writing is not as good as those who can? No, it does not. I know fabulous writers who are still unpublished (and, yes, Jeannie, I mean you). Writing good books (however you define “good”) and making money from books are two different things. Sometimes they co-incide—sometimes not.
There are lots of ways to measure success as a writer: good reviews, respect of your peers, winning prizes, or best of all—knowing that you’ve written a book that you’re really proud of. The last one is best of all because all the others will do your head in. What happens if you stop getting good reviews or winning prizes? Does that mean you’re no longer a good writer? That path leads to madness.
In my genre lots of books I don’t like sell better than mine, and lots I adore sell worse. Neither state of things has anything to do with how my books sell. If you start thinking that other books published are stealing sales from your books, and that other writers are “the competition”, you will become bitter and twisted. I’m hear to tell you that bitter & twisted clashes with every single thing you’ve got in your wardrobe.
Trust me on this.
Thus endeth the rant.
Posted by Justine at 10:27, 8 September 2006 under Praising, Publishing business, Ranting, Writing life | 11 Comments »
Comments
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
-
[...] A writer after my own heart. Check it out. [...]
Pingback from See? Justine says so, too. on 8 September, 2006 at 9:50 PM
Pingback from See? Justine says so, too. on 8 September, 2006 at 9:50 PM
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

- 1930s NYC novel
- Admin
- Basketball
- Battle of the Sexes in Science Fiction
- Best of Blog
- Bloggery
- Book challenges
- Book tour
- Cons & Other Gatherings
- Cricket
- Daughters of Earth
- Excuses
- Fans & readers
- Fashion
- Feminism
- First Kiss
- Food
- Frippery
- Garden
- Guest post
- How To Ditch Your Fairy
- Ideas
- Ironical (This is Writ)
- Last Day of the Year
- Liar
- Liquids
- Listening
- Love is Hell
- Magic or Madness trilogy
- Manga
- Mangosteens
- Musings
- New York City/USA
- Praising
- Publishing business
- RSI
- Ranting
- Reading
- Research
- Science
- Scott's books
- Search Terms
- Sport
- State of the World
- Sydney/Australia
- Team Human
- Titles & names
- Toilets
- Tour de France
- Travelling
- Unicorns
- Vainglory
- Viewing
- What's your fairy?
- Whingeing
- Words & Language
- Writing goals & milestones
- Writing life
- Writing process
- Young Adult literature
- Zombies
- Zombies v Unicorns
Categories
Archives
- Apparently there were rumours about of the mutiny in Townsville but no hard proof till now: http://t.co/vlyNtoOm #want2knowmore # 2012/02/09
- A fascinating discovery of a mutiny against racist white officers in US army during WW2: http://t.co/vlyNtoOm # 2012/02/09
- @supernovakgirl I may use this skateboard for evil. #noonecanstopme #mwahahaha # 2012/02/09
Recent Comments
- Nicole J. LeBoeuf-Little on Last Day of 2011 (Updated)
- Hillary! on Writing Goals Reduxing the Redux
- Ruth Diaz on The Misery of Voice Recognition Software
- Ruth Diaz on The Misery of Voice Recognition Software
- The Outer Alliance » Outer Alliance Podcast #16: The “Queer SF&F” Panel at Arisia on Sekrit Project Revealed!
- Kaethe on Writing Goals Reduxing the Redux
- Justine on Writing Goals Reduxing the Redux
- rockinlibrarian on Writing Goals Reduxing the Redux
- Mike on Writing Goals Reduxing the Redux
- Little Willow on Writing Goals Reduxing the Redux
- Zeborah on Writing Goals Reduxing the Redux
- Ruth on Personal FAQ
- elockhart on Last Day of 2011 (Updated)
- Linda Frasier on Liar Spoiler Thread (updated)
- Megan R. on Liar Spoiler Thread (updated)
Recent Posts
- Writing Goals Reduxing the Redux
- Last Day of 2011 (Updated)
- My Books of Electrons!
- Because No One Should Suffer Alone
- Sekrit Project Revealed!
- Writing Liar with Scrivener
- Feeling Good
- The Misery of Voice Recognition Software
- Photo Request
- Zombies Versus Unicorns debate in Sydney
- I Love Bad Reviews
- YA Mafias & Other Things You Don’t Need to Worry About
- Last Day of 2010
- Farewell For Now
- Guest Post: Bernice McFadden on the Writing Life
Best of Blog
- Liar Spoiler Thread (updated)
- January is writing advice month (sticky post) Updated
- How I finished my first novel
- Types of crazy writers
- How to rewrite
- Getting paid, or, don’t quit your day job
- How to write a novel*
- A Writer’s Job (Updated)
- Too Young to Publish
- Average First Novel Advances
- A Beginner’s Guide to Cricket
- Being Dumped is Much Much Worse



holly Says:
This is true. I work in a bookstore. When kids finish one series, they come looking for another author. One person’s success is also your success.
September 8th, 2006 at 12:16 PM
Katie Says:
Certainly competitive and zero sum are not right: they don’t describe what really happens, and they muck up what work you might be doing, the work of positively pushing the world around while being transformed yourself.
But it’s hard not to notice Justine, that you do a lot of kinds of work additional to writing: I note the list at my right: appearances, bibliography, bio and multiple careers, community building, creating ways for folks to learn how to read you as well as where you get your stuff. When I logged onto Amazon recently, there you were in a thing I’d never heard of before, a “plog”! You had to sign up for that, do the work (or have someone else do the work) of getting “authorized” by amazon.
Writing is not the only work you do to make a book! (Not to mention all the other folks who make it a book too, although that doesn’t make all your work especially easy, or easier.)
Here you are on the blog, helping others to think about becoming writers, being writers, giving support to writers, helping us all imagine our writer-ness, the nuts and blots of it all. And again, teaching us all how to read you. Which includes appreciating you.
I love the picture of you on the Amazon plog: the hair is fabulous!
September 8th, 2006 at 12:31 PM
3. Justine Says:
Holly: I hear that over and over. Booksellers tell me they handsell my books to people wanting more books like Tithe and Valiant and, weirdly, His Dark Materials. Very pleasing to hear. Bless all booksellers! And everyone else what reads!
Katie: Thank you! I definitely think a writer’s job encompasses all that. As it happens I wrote a whole post on that of which you speak. The comments thread is particularly entertaining.
Everyone loves that photo. It’s excellently silly!
September 8th, 2006 at 3:46 PM
Robin Brande Says:
Justine, you’re right, you’re brilliant, thanks for saying this.
September 8th, 2006 at 9:46 PM
Maggie Says:
I always say I wouldn’t be published today if it weren’t for J. K. YA Canadian publishers (in the past) were notorious for only publishing regionalized stories. All my writer friends said I would never get a first book published if it was fantasy. Then along came J. K. and suddenly fantasy was popular (even with Canadian publishers). Yay J. K.! I bow to her shrine too!
September 9th, 2006 at 9:07 AM
Katie Says:
I read the posts and comments on self promotion and found it enlightening, witty, and helpful.
But I still wonder:
Is teaching people how to read you the same, or included in, self promotion? Or is its something in addition to all that, less nuts and bolts and more, ah hem, epistemological? (Sorry). (Not that nuts and bolts aren’t epistemological.)
I’m reading a manuscript now for an academic book that refers to Cherrie Moraga’s Portrait of a Queer Motherhood (which I haven’t read yet) and its analysis kept reminding me of Magic or Madness, and (ah hem) its “world.” Those feminist revisions that are not utopian.
Meanwhile I have waiting here a bunch of Ellen Kushner to read after falling for Privilege of the Sword. How could a person who “loves” Dorothy Dunnett and Highlander not fall for this world?
September 9th, 2006 at 12:49 PM
Rebecca Says:
i liketh your rants.
September 9th, 2006 at 1:41 PM
A.R.Yngve Says:
What about reader responses? Is there a better measure of writerly success than reader letters? I live for those moments when a reader writes in to tell me her opinion of something I wrote.
That is worth more than money: it’s proof that you TOUCHED the reader’s soul.
September 9th, 2006 at 6:48 PM
sh Says:
“the last one is best of all because all the others will do your head in. what happens if you stop getting good reviews or winning prizes? does that mean you’re no longer a good writer? that path leads to madness.”
i weep.
that just makes so much sense. and not just applicable to writing.
ta.
September 11th, 2006 at 6:21 AM
10. Justine Says:
Thanks all!
Maggie: Zackly! All hail J.K.!
Katie: I’m not sure a writer can teach people to read them. The variety of responses I’ve gotten has confirmed for me just how little control the writer has over how they’re read.
. . . its analysis kept reminding me of Magic or Madness
Really? That’s too cool.
So pleased you’re into Kushner. She’s unspeakably wonderful and addictive.
Rebecca: Excellent! More rants it is!
A.R.Yngve:
What about reader responses?
For me they’re in the same class as reviews. Yes, good ones are awesome, but you cannot get dependent on them. Cause you’ll also get ranty I-hate-your-work-and-you letters from readers.
SH: You’re welcome!
September 11th, 2006 at 5:23 PM