As for Refracted Light, I have no problem with their use of the word “morality”. They explain exactly what they mean by it, and, you know, it’s their website. Their Christian website, so, of course, it’s going to mean their version of Christian morality. Also I’m not sure they are fundamentalists. One of the reviewers is a Catholic and the other a Presbyterian. I certainly didn’t get an over-the-top fundamentalist vibe from the reviews.

regarding “refracted light”: i have to say i object to the use of the word “morality”, since it’s clear from reading through a few reviews that “morality” means “alignment with MY IDEA of christian strictures.” that is to say, they are using the term “morality” to mean “the morality of OUR christian sect.” i would have no problem with that if they would just say so, but i do have a problem with them using general “morality”, because their morality is clearly not mine, and their use of language is misleading.

basically, they’re doing what all christian fundamentalists seem to do, which is to say that their christian fundamentalist morality is the only “morality”; that my system of rules and mores–which includes supporting gay marriage, and finding many non-christian and anti-christian ideas and narratives good and compelling–is not a system of “morality” at all. basically, they’re saying that only christians’ ethics can be moral.